<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Evaluating Facilitation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vivmcwaters.com.au/2008/07/11/evaluating-facilitation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vivmcwaters.com.au/2008/07/11/evaluating-facilitation/</link>
	<description>facilitation, working with groups</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 04:59:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Viv McWaters</title>
		<link>http://vivmcwaters.com.au/2008/07/11/evaluating-facilitation/comment-page-1/#comment-1098</link>
		<dc:creator>Viv McWaters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 14:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vivmcwaters.com.au/?p=320#comment-1098</guid>
		<description>Hi Stuart
In the first approach people write down on a flip chart a few facts and figures about the event eg two day, 15 people etc. Then they write down some reactions eg surprised, tired, fun etc. For the Significance heaing they&#039;d add something about why the event was important eg we learnt, discovered, planned etc. And finally What Difference it Made - we will try our new skills back at work etc. These questions are answered in a small group at the same time that others are working in the other groups.

The Three Bears is a good approach when people are reluctant to say anything critical. BTW, it&#039;s called Three Bears because it&#039;s a take on the Three Bears porridge - too hot, too cold and just right. So, for Just Right they&#039;d say what was &#039;just right&#039; in the workshop. In &#039;Too Much&#039; they could say we spent too much tie on a particular topic or activity for example, and for &#039;More&#039; they would sy what they&#039;d like more of.

I find the combination of all of these gives me a lot of valuable information.

Cheers Viv</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Stuart<br />
In the first approach people write down on a flip chart a few facts and figures about the event eg two day, 15 people etc. Then they write down some reactions eg surprised, tired, fun etc. For the Significance heaing they&#8217;d add something about why the event was important eg we learnt, discovered, planned etc. And finally What Difference it Made &#8211; we will try our new skills back at work etc. These questions are answered in a small group at the same time that others are working in the other groups.</p>
<p>The Three Bears is a good approach when people are reluctant to say anything critical. BTW, it&#8217;s called Three Bears because it&#8217;s a take on the Three Bears porridge &#8211; too hot, too cold and just right. So, for Just Right they&#8217;d say what was &#8216;just right&#8217; in the workshop. In &#8216;Too Much&#8217; they could say we spent too much tie on a particular topic or activity for example, and for &#8216;More&#8217; they would sy what they&#8217;d like more of.</p>
<p>I find the combination of all of these gives me a lot of valuable information.</p>
<p>Cheers Viv</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Reid</title>
		<link>http://vivmcwaters.com.au/2008/07/11/evaluating-facilitation/comment-page-1/#comment-1097</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Reid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 13:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vivmcwaters.com.au/?p=320#comment-1097</guid>
		<description>Hi Viv - I&#039;m intrigued by these approaches. Could you say a bit more about how the first and second approaches actually work?

Many thanks!

Stuart</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Viv &#8211; I&#8217;m intrigued by these approaches. Could you say a bit more about how the first and second approaches actually work?</p>
<p>Many thanks!</p>
<p>Stuart</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
