“Publish, then filter”


January 12th, 2009

Ross Hill wrote in an email to the Creative Skills Training Council that said, in part: “the web works on the “publish, then filter” model, not the “filter, then publish” model of traditional media.”

I once trained, and worked, as a journalist. This is so true of traditional media – so many filters to get through before something is published. Now as a blogger I’m revelling in the freedom that ‘publish then filter’ provides. You, the reader, can determine if my writing is worthwhile or not. And provide instant feedback via comments. And I can do what everyone needing to hone a skill needs to do – practice. You can read more about facilitation as a practice art here.

 

2 Comments so far

  1. Eva Schiffer on January 15, 2009 7:07 am

    Dear Viv,
    That’s an interesting thought and helps me to understand, why I find writing blog posts so much easier than writing research papers. But also why institutional blogs at for example a research organization can be so cumbersome and slow, because the typical researcher feels terribly out of his/her depth to put something out to a broader public without going through the well organized buffer process of peer-review. Blogging seems to work for a certain type of people (who might or might not publish their thoughts otherwise).
    Cheers
    Eva

  2. Viv McWaters on January 15, 2009 7:13 pm

    Thanks Eva
    That’s an interesting perspective that I hadn’t considered – I guess the traditional filtering process that most scientific publications adhere to provides a safety net enabling both those who publish and those who read to have confidence in the content. From a science communications perspective I’d like to think there’s a place for both – so scientists can hone their communications skills and develop (maybe surprising) collaborations through blogging.
    Cheers
    Viv

Name (required)

Email (required)

Website

Speak your mind

This blog is kept spam free by WP-SpamFree.