<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s happening?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vivmcwaters.com.au/2009/04/13/whats-happening/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vivmcwaters.com.au/2009/04/13/whats-happening/</link>
	<description>facilitation, working with groups</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 18:26:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Eva Schiffer</title>
		<link>http://vivmcwaters.com.au/2009/04/13/whats-happening/comment-page-1/#comment-1421</link>
		<dc:creator>Eva Schiffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 21:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vivmcwaters.com.au/?p=951#comment-1421</guid>
		<description>Viv,
You made me smile again, talking about you and your like minded mates... The other day I listened to a radio program about the effect of heterogeneity on group performance and self-assessment. They quoted a study that showed that groups that have to accommodate a stranger (someone who is different from the rest) tend to achieve better results. But - and isn&#039;t that interesting - they think they are doing worse than the more homogeneous groups. 

So the question the authors pose is &quot;Is the pain worth the gain? http://netmap.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/liljenquist_2009_pain_worth_the_gain.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Viv,<br />
You made me smile again, talking about you and your like minded mates&#8230; The other day I listened to a radio program about the effect of heterogeneity on group performance and self-assessment. They quoted a study that showed that groups that have to accommodate a stranger (someone who is different from the rest) tend to achieve better results. But &#8211; and isn&#8217;t that interesting &#8211; they think they are doing worse than the more homogeneous groups. </p>
<p>So the question the authors pose is &#8220;Is the pain worth the gain? <a href="http://netmap.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/liljenquist_2009_pain_worth_the_gain.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://netmap.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/liljenquist_2009_pain_worth_the_gain.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

